BiblioAlertes du 18 mars 2013

18 mars 2013 par Frank Arnould

Acta Psychologica, vol. 142, n° 2, 2013 :

Hu, X., Evans, A., Wu, H., Lee, K., & Fu, G. An interfering dot-probe task facilitates the detection of mock crime memory in a reaction time (RT)-based concealed information test, pp. 278‑285. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.12.006

American Journal of Psychology (The), vol. 126, n° 1, 2013 :

Leding, J. K. Need for cognition is related to the rejection (but not the acceptance) of false memories, pp. 1‑10. doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.1.0001

Bristish Journal of Developmental Psychology, vol. 31, n° 1, 2013 :

Smith, R. M., & LaFreniere, P. J. Development of tactical deception from 4 to 8 years of age, pp. 30–41. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02071.x

Developmental Psychology, vol. 49, n° 2, 2013 :

Waterman, A. H., & Blades, M. The effect of delay and individual differences on children’s tendency to guess, 215‑226. doi:10.1037/a0028354

Emotion, vol. 13, n° 1, 2013 :

Houston, K. A., Clifford, B. R., Phillips, L. H., & Memon, A. The emotional eyewitness : The effects of emotion on specific aspects of eyewitness recall and recognition performance, pp. 118‑128. doi:10.1037/a0029220. Lire le compte rendu sur PsychoTémoins.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 7, 2013 :

Park, K. K., Suk, H. W., Hwang, H., & Lee, J.-H. A functional analysis of deception detection of a mock crime using infrared thermal imaging and the Concealed Information Test, pp. 70. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00070. Accès libre en ligne.

International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, vol. 36, n° 1, 2013 :

Morgan, C. A., Southwick, S., Steffian, G., Hazlett, G. A., & Loftus, E. F. Misinformation can influence memory for recently experienced, highly stressful events, pp. 11‑17. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.11.002

International Journal of Psychophysiology, vol. 87, n° 1, 2013 :

Meek, S. W., Phillips, M. C., Boswell, C. P., & Vendemia, J. M. C. Deception and the misinformation effect : An event-related potential study, pp. 81‑87. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.11.004

Journal of Cognitive Psychology, vol. 25, n° 1, 2013 :

Megreya, A. M., & Bindemann, M. Individual differences in personality and face identification, 30‑37. doi:10.1080/20445911.2012.739153

Medico-Legal Journal (The), vol. 81, n° 1, 2013 :

Kopelman, M. Memory disorders in the law courts, pp. 18‑28. doi:10.1177/0025817213477010

Memory, vol. 21, n° 2, 2013 :

Sherman, S. M. False recall and recognition of brand names increases over time, 219‑229. doi:10.1080/09658211.2012.720992

Memory and Cognition, vol. 41, n° 3, 2013 :

Choi, H.-Y., Kensinger, E. A., & Rajaram, S. Emotional content enhances true but not false memory for categorized stimuli, pp. 403‑415. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0269-2

Neuroreport, vol. 24, n° 3, 2013 :

Boldini, A., Beato, M. S., & Cadavid, S. Modality-match effect in false recognition., 108‑113. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835c93e3

PLoS ONE, vol. 8, n° 2, 2013 :

Proietti, V., Pisacane, A., & Macchi Cassia, V. (2013). Natural experience modulates the processing of older adult faces in young adults and 3-Year-old children, e57499. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057499. Accès libre en ligne.

Psychological Science, vol. 24, n° 3, 2013 :

Reder, L. M., Victoria, L. W., Manelis, A., Oates, J. M., Dutcher, J. M., Bates, J. T., … Gyulai, F. Why it’s easier to remember seeing a face we already know than one we don’t : Preexisting memory representations facilitate memory formation, pp. 363‑372. doi:10.1177/0956797612457396

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 20, n° 2, 2013 :

Badham, S. P., Wade, K. A., Watts, H. J. E., Woods, N. G., & Maylor, E. A. (2013). Replicating distinctive facial features in lineups : identification performance in young versus older adults, pp. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0339-2. Lire le compte rendu sur PsychoTémoins.

Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, vol. 27, n° 1-2, 2013 :

Reinhard, M.-A. (2013). Wer kann den Lügner entlarven ? Need for Cognition und die Fähigkeit von Lehramtsstudierenden Wahrheit und Lüge zu erkennen [Who can catch a liar ? Need for Cognition and teacher students’ ability to discriminate truth and deception], pp. 63‑75. doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000089