BiblioAlertes du 5 juin 2012

5 juin 2012 par Frank Arnould

Brain and Cognition, vol. 78, n° 2, 2012 :

Wiese, H., Kloth, N., Güllmar, D., Reichenbach, J. R., & Schweinberger, S. R. Perceiving age and gender in unfamiliar faces : An fMRI study on face categorization, pp. 163-168. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.012. Lire le compte rendu sur PsychoTémoins.

International Journal of Psychophysiology, vol. 84, n° 2, 2012 :

Zvi, L., Nachson, I., & Elaad, E. Effects of coping and cooperative instructions on guilty and informed innocents’ physiological responses to concealed information, pp. 140-148. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.01.022

Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, vol. 1, n° 2, 2012 :

Sauer, J. D., Brewer, N., & Weber, N. Using confidence ratings to identify a target among foils, pp. 80-88. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.03.003

Bindemann, M., Brown, C., Koyas, T., & Russ, A. Individual differences in face identification postdict eyewitness accuracy, pp. 96-103. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.001. Lire le compte rendu sur PsychoTémoins.

Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. Eliciting cues to deception and truth : What matters are the questions asked, pp. 110-117. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004

Kassin, S. M. Paradigm shift in the study of human lie-detection : Bridging the gap between science and practice, pp. 118-119. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.04.009

DePaulo, B. M., & Bond Jr., C. F. Beyond accuracy : Bigger, broader ways to think about deceit, pp. 120-121. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.04.010

Evans, J. R., Houston, K. A., & Meissner, C. A. A positive, collaborative, and theoretically-based approach to improving deception detection, pp. 122-123. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.04.007

van Koppen, P. J. Deception detection in police interrogations : Closing in on the context of criminal investigations, pp. 124-125. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.04.005

Buckley, J. P. Detection of deception researchers needs to collaborate with experienced practitioners, pp. 126-127. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.04.002

Bond, G. D. Focus on basic cognitive mechanisms and strategies in deception research (and remand custody of ‘wizards’ to Harry Potter movies), pp. 128-130. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.04.003

Frank, M. G., & Svetieva, E. Lies worth catching involve both emotion and cognition, pp. 131-133. doi:10.1016/j.ja

Tedeschini, J. Overcoming roadblocks to reform, pp. 134-135. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.04.008

Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. The sound of critics : New tunes, old tunes, and resistance to play, pp. 139-143. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.05.001


Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, vol. 141, n° 2, 2012 :

Jaeger, A., Cox, J. C., & Dobbins, I. G. Recognition confidence under violated and confirmed memory expectations, pp. 282-301. doi:10.1037/a0025687

Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 7, n° 3, 2012 :

Clark, S. E. Eyewitness identification reform : Data, theory, and due process, pp. 279-283. doi:10.1177/1745691612444136

Laudan, L. Eyewitness identifications : one more lesson on the costs of excluding relevant evidence, pp. 272-274. doi:10.1177/1745691612443065

Wells, G. L., Steblay, N. K., & Dysart, J. E. Eyewitness identification reforms are suggestiveness-induced hits and guesses true hits ? pp. 264-271. doi:10.1177/1745691612443368

Wixted, J. T., & Mickes, L. The field of eyewitness memory should abandon probative value and embrace Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis, pp. 275-278. doi:10.1177/1745691612442906

Psychological Bulletin, vol. 138, n° 3, 2012 :

Dalenberg, C. J., Brand, B. L., Gleaves, D. H., Dorahy, M. J., Loewenstein, R. J., Cardeña, E., Frewen, P. A., et al. Evaluation of the evidence for the trauma and fantasy models of dissociation, pp. 550-588. doi:10.1037/a0027447

Psychology, Crime & Law, vol. 18, n° 5-6, 2012 :

Wessel, E. M., Bollingmo, G. C., Sønsteby, C., Nielsen, L. M., Eliersten, D. E., & Magnussen, S. he emotional witness effect : story content, emotional valence and credibility of a male suspect, pp. 417-430. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.502119. Lire le compte rendu sur PsychoTémoins.

Ruva, C. L., & LeVasseur, M. A. Behind closed doors : the effect of pretrial publicity on jury deliberations, pp. 431-452. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.502120

Olson, E. A., & Charman, S. D. ‘But can you prove it ?’ – examining the quality of innocent suspects’ alibis, pp. 453-471. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.505567

Bornstein, B. H., Deffenbacher, K. A., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2012). Effects of exposure time and cognitive operations on facial identification accuracy : a meta-analysis of two variables associated with initial memory strength, pp. 473-490. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.508458. Lire le compte rendu sur PsychoTémoins.

Ahola, A. How reliable are eyewitness memories ? Effects of retention interval, violence of act, and gender stereotypes on observers’ judgments of their own memory regarding witnessed act and perpetrator, pp. 491-503. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.509316

Nahari, G. Elaborations on credibility judgements by professional lie detectors and laypersons : Stategies of judgement and justification, pp. 567—577. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.511222

Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. Imposing cognitive load to elicit cues to deceit : Inducing the reverse order technique naturally, 579-594. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.515987. Lire le compte rendu sur PsychoTémoins.

The Journal of General Psychology, vol. 139, n° 2, 2012 :

Randall, J. L., Tabernik, H. E., Aguilera, A. M., Anastasi, J. S., & Valk, K. V. (2012). Effects of encoding tasks on the own-age face recognition bias, pp. 55-67. doi:10.1080/00221309.2012.657266. Lire le compte rendu sur PsychoTémoins.